Shelby Requests Federal Watchdogs Probe FHFA, Fannie, Freddie

Morning Consult, Apr. 18, 2016–Rainey, Ryan
Senate Banking Committee Chairman Richard Shelby on Monday requested the Government Accountability Office and Congressional Budget Office look into practices at the Federal Housing Finance Agency and the government-sponsored enterprises it oversees.

How Much Will Principal Reduction Affect Servicers?

DSNews, Apr. 18, 2016–Honea, Brian 
The controversial principal reduction program announced by the Federal Housing Finance Agency last week is expected to moderately increase expenses for mortgage servicers who handle delinquent Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac loans, but overall the impact of the program on servicers is expected to be minimal, according to a report from Fitch Ratings on Monday.

Stop Overcharging FHA Borrowers to Subsidize Reverse Mortgage Risks

National Mortgage News, Apr. 18, 2016–Chappelle, Brian
Chappelle, founding partner of Potomac Partners, said first-time homebuyers face enough challenges to qualify for a mortgage in today’s housing market without having to subsidize the reverse mortgage program.

Is This the Secret to Housing Reform?

National Mortgage News, Apr. 8, 2016–Collins, Brian
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac’s experiments with selling credit risk to investors are a critical element of new plan to merge the two entities and move them out of conservatorship, but what form so-called credit risk transfers take could make a big difference.

J.P. Morgan: We’re Too Big Not to Succeed

Wall Street Journal, Apr. 7, 2016–Glazer, Emily
In a proxy released Thursday morning, J.P. Morgan pushed back against a shareholder proposal for a bank breakup, pointing to its business synergies, benefits of scale and value to clients.

A More Promising Road to Reform

Urban Institute, Apr. 7, 2016–Zandi, Mark
In today’s housing finance system, two behemoth institutions, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, control most of the core infrastructure of the secondary market and take on most of its credit risk. While in many ways this system has served the nation well by providing a broad range of borrowers access to credit and a level playing field for lenders of all sizes, our reliance on this duopoly created perverse incentives that ultimately led to too much risk taking, forcing taxpayers to shoulder the resulting cost.