Structuring the Suspicious Activity Report Narrative: A Four-Part Framework That Works, May 19

Click here for more information.

About the Event

Writing an effective Suspicious Activity Report (SAR) narrative requires more than documenting facts—it demands clarity, structure, and consistency. This webinar introduces a practical, four-paragraph framework to help professionals confidently draft SAR essays that meet regulatory expectations and clearly communicate key findings.

Whether you are part of a large financial institution’s fraud or BSA/AML team, or a lender who occasionally encounters suspicious activity, this session provides a repeatable approach to SAR writing that can be applied across roles and organizations.

Participants will learn how to structure their narratives—from the opening summary through representations made, investigative findings, and conclusion—while incorporating appropriate language and avoiding common pitfalls. Through real-world examples, speakers will demonstrate how to present well-supported conclusions, including when and how to incorporate reasonable speculation.

Date/Time:

Tuesday, May 19 (2:00 PM – 3:00 PM ET)

Objectives:

Apply a four-paragraph structure (opening, representations, investigation, conclusion) to SAR narratives
Ensure SAR essays meet key reporting expectations and requirements
Use clear, appropriate, and compliant language
Incorporate well-supported conclusions and reasonable speculation with confidence
Improve consistency across SARs to support stronger internal review and oversight

Target Audience:

BSA/AML Analysts and Fraud Investigators at financial institutions
Mortgage Lenders and Loan Originators identifying potential red flags
Compliance and Risk Management professionals
Any professional who may report suspicious activity in financial transactions

Speaker(s):

Bob Simpson, Esq., CAMS, CEO, DaylightAML
Jim Petros, SVP, Chief Compliance Officer and Corporate Counsel, Carrington Mortgage Services